University of Toronto · Medical Humanities

Communicating with care

A teaching toolkit for the Medical Humanities workshop. The same model can sound cold and clinical or clear and humane — the difference is how you ask.

The same result, explained two ways GPT-5.5
Weak prompt

“Explain this MRI report.”

What you get

A wall of jargon the patient can't follow.

Strong prompt

“Explain this MRI report to a worried patient in plain, kind language.”

What you get

A clear, compassionate explanation they actually understand.

The idea

AI as a partner for humane clinical communication.

Every example here comes from real clinical moments: breaking difficult news, explaining an incidental finding, de-escalating a frustrated patient, speaking up respectfully. A small change in how you prompt turns a technically-correct answer into one a patient or colleague can actually understand and trust.

Weak prompt

“Summarize this radiology report.”

Accurate, but full of jargon and easy to misread under stress.

Strong prompt

“Explain it to the patient in plain language, with empathy and next steps.”

Clear, compassionate, and ready for a real conversation.

Free and open

Bring clarity and compassion to every conversation.

Start with the worked examples, then bring the prompts into your own clinical communication.